MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SHERLOC: A phase 2 study of MM-121 plus with docetaxel versus docetaxel alone in patients with heregulin (HRG) positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2019· article· en· W2948008600 on OpenAlexaff
Lecia V. Sequist, Pasi A. Jänne, Rudolf M. Huber, Jhanelle E. Gray, Enriqueta Felip, M. Pérol, Fred R. Hirsch, Daniel Shao-Weng Tan, Geoffrey Kuesters, Alena Zalutskaya, Sergio Santillana, J. Marc Pipas, Frances A. Shepherd

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDocetaxelMedicineInternal medicineClinical endpointOncologyLung cancerInterim analysisPaclitaxelPhases of clinical researchAdverse effectAdenocarcinomaCancerChemotherapyRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

9036 Background: Seribantumab (MM-121) is a human monoclonal IgG2 antibody that blocks the HRG domain of HER3. Preclinical data suggest that seribantumab reverses HRG mediated drug resistance across multiple cancer models. In prior retrospective analyses, addition of seribantumab to standard of care (SOC) appeared to improve outcomes in pts with HRG+ tumors. Here we tested if seribantumab plus SOC improved progression-free survival (PFS) in pts with HRG+ lung adenocarcinoma who had received prior platinum-based therapy. Methods: SHERLOC was a randomized, open-label, multicenter, Phase 2 study in pts with advanced HRG+ adenocarcinoma of the lung. Archival or pre-treatment tumor samples were assessed for HRG+ by RNA in situ hybridization. Eligibility criteria included prior platinum-based therapy for advanced disease with ≤ 2 total prior lines of therapy (prior IO was allowed) and no EGFR or ALK mutations. Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive seribantumab 3000 mg/docetaxel 75 mg IV q3w (experimental; exp) or docetaxel 75 mg IV q3w alone (control). Primary endpoint was PFS. Key secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse event (AEs) profile. Results: At a pre-specified interim analysis of 75% of total PFS events, 108 pts were enrolled (exp n = 71, control n = 37). Median age was 62y (range 34-83y); female 34%; one prior treatment only 39%. Median PFS was 3.0m for exp and 4.0m for control, HR = 1.66m (p = 0.084). Median OS was 7.9m for exp and 8.4m for control, HR = 1.50 (p = 0.235). ORR was 19.7% for exp and 5.6% for control (p = 0.052). Serious AEs were more frequent in the exp arm (40.8%) vs control (24.3%). Most common treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs) in the exp arm were diarrhea (47%), fatigue (37%), and neutropenia (27%). Based on a determination of futility at interim analysis, the study was terminated early. Conclusions: Seribantumab failed to improve PFS when added to docetaxel among previously treated advanced HRG+ NSCLC pts. A higher response rate and a higher incidence of TEAEs were observed in the exp arm. No further study of seribantumab is planned in NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT02387216.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.412 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsFrench-language works237,207