Two-Phase Dynamic Modeling and Simulation of Transport and Reaction in Catalytic Sulfur Dioxide Converters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The catalytic sulfur dioxide converters, in which sulfur dioxide is oxidized to sulfur trioxide, are the key units in sulfuric acid plants to reduce the sulfur dioxide emission from industrial smelters into the atmosphere. In this paper, a two-phase mechanistic model for the transport and oxidation processes in such converters is developed. Important variables and mechanisms, such as mass conservation, chemical reactions, and heat transfer, are carefully considered. Using empirical relations or industrial values for the parameters, several simulations have been conducted, including the steady-state operation and dynamic responses to sudden changes in feed sulfur dioxide concentration. Such information is valuable for understanding the complex processes and dynamic behaviors in sulfur dioxide converters and other similar reactors. A direct comparison between the simulated and measured outlet temperatures has been performed for an 800 min period based on the collected industrial data from a sulfur dioxide converter. The satisfactory agreement suggests that, in addition to the ability to reveal detailed dynamic information in the sulfur dioxide oxidation process, the developed two-phase model could be useful for practical applications such as the design, operation, and maintenance of sulfur dioxide converters and other catalytic porous reactors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".