MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948031604 · doi:10.4000/polysemes.4831

Performative Archives: The Visual Poetry of bpNichol and Derek Beaulieu

2019· article· en· W2948031604 on OpenAlex
Fiona Mcmahon

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolysèmes · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPoetry Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTextualityPerformative utterancePoetryMateriality (auditing)NarrativeMetaphorTemporalityHaikuLiteratureLife writingVisual artsArtAestheticsHistoryPhilosophyLinguisticsEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By taking to task the materiality of writing, visual poetry asks what can be remembered and through what channels. Though the archive may function in poetry in the broadest sense as a metaphor for memory, the boundaries of that narrative change along with the shape of the print medium. If visual poetry is an archive of scriptural experiment, its recordings are subject to the flux of a dynamic aesthetic and an environment increasingly grounded in technology. This paper will concentrate upon the dramatization of textuality through the example of two Canadian poets, bpNichol and Derek Beaulieu across the twentieth and the twenty-first century. It shall be considered how their visual poetries engage with archival processes and in doing so, bring into focus the changing temporality and spaces of memory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it