MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948102911 · doi:10.38011/jhli.v3i1.37

Kontribusi Industri Tekstil dalam Penggunaan Bahan Berbahaya dan Beracun Terhadap Rusaknya Sungai Citarum

2017· article· id· W2948102911 on OpenAlex
Desriko Malayu Putra

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia · 2017
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indonesia merupakan Negara yang masuk dalam jajaran 10 besar pengeksporpakaian terbesar dunia dan pada tahun 2011 Indonesia merupakan negarapengekspor terbesar ke-11 di dunia. Indonesia adalah negara dengan ekonomiyang paling besar di Asia Tenggara, dan sektor tekstil menyumbang 8,9 persentotal ekspor Indonesia pada 2010. Tulisan ini akan melihat bagaimana kontribusisektor industri tekstil terhadap rusaknya Sungai Citarum. Metodologi penulisanini munggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif yang diperkuat oleh kasus kegiatanindustri yang letaknya bersebelahan dengan Sungai Citarum. Sungai Citarummemiliki reputasi buruk sebagai sungai terkotor di dunia. Masalah kasat mataberupa sampah dan limbah domestik memang terlihat parah. Tetapi limbah daribahan berbahaya dan beracun yang digunakan dalam industri tekstil merupakansumber besar dari pencemaran dengan konsekuensi jangka panjang yang lebihserius, terutama di bagian hulu Sungai Citarum di mana terdapat 68 persen pabriktekstil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.215
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0190.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it