MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948133660 · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2019.2917547

Adaptive Finite-Time Fuzzy Funnel Control for Nonaffine Nonlinear Systems

2019· article· en· W2948133660 on OpenAlexaff
Cungen Liu, Huanqing Wang, Xiaoping Liu, Yucheng Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersTaishan Scholar Project of Shandong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsFunnelBacksteppingControl theory (sociology)Tracking errorNonlinear systemController (irrigation)Fuzzy logicBounded functionComputer scienceTransformation (genetics)Fuzzy control systemTracking (education)Process (computing)Adaptive controlMathematicsControl (management)EngineeringArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper, for the first time, presents an adaptive finite-time fuzzy funnel controller for nonaffine nonlinear systems via backstepping. To ensure the tracking error with prescribed boundedness, a modified transformation for funnel error is developed and embedded in the procedure of control design. The unknown packaged nonlinear functions appeared in the controller design process are approximated by using fuzzy logic systems. It is proved that the proposed method guarantees that the output tracking error falls within a preset funnel and all signals in the closed-loop system are semi-globally practically finite-time bounded (SGPFB). Simulations are carried out to demonstrate the effectiveness of the controller design scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations100
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics SystemsSame topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207