MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948134094

Impact assessment of rabi Onion variety Agrifound Light Red (AFLR) through OFTs in Sidhi District of Madhya Pradesh

2019· article· en· W2948134094 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richa Singh, Richa Dahiya, M. S. Baghel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Economics and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultureAgricultural scienceProductivityYield (engineering)MathematicsQuarter (Canadian coin)Non-invasive ventilationToxicologyAgricultural economicsGeographyBusinessBiologyEconomicsEconomic growthPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sidhi district is situated in Kaymore plateau and satpura hills of Madhya Pradesh. Onion is one of the major vegetable crops grown in rabi season in district. Krishi Vigyan Kendra laid down On Farm Demonstration in the year 2012-13 with scientific package of practices, high yielding variety “Agrifound Light Red (AFLR)” and applying scientific practices in their cultivation. The OFTs were carried out in village “Chorgadhi” block Rampur Naikin of Sidhi district in supervision of KVK scientist. The productivity and economic returns of Onion in improved technologies were calculated and compared with the corresponding farmer’s practices (local check). The improved technology recorded higher yield of 285 q/ha respectively 192 q/ha. The average yield increase was observed 48.43 per cent. In spite of increase in yield of Onion, technology gap, extension gap and technology index existed. The improved technology gave higher gross return (285000 & 192000 Rs./ha), net return (245000 & 162000 Rs./ha) with higher benefit cost ratio (1.4.8 & 1.5) as compared to farmer’s practices. The increase in the yield was found to be due to the lack of good agriculture practices, lack of knowledge dissemination and lower socio economic condition. Under sustainable agricultural practices, with this study it is concluded that the OFTs programmes were effective in changing attitude, skill and knowledge of improved package and practices of HYV of Onion adoption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative ResearchSame topicAgricultural Economics and PracticesFrench-language works237,207