MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948137641 · doi:10.33423/jabe.v20i3.337

Study of Economic Performance of India due to Trade with SAARC Countries

2018· article· en· W2948137641 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vranda Jain, Surender Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Business and Economics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Economics and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGranger causalitySri lankaEconomicsCausality (physics)International economicsReal gross domestic productInternational tradeMonetary economicsEconometricsSocioeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper empirically examines the trade led growth paradigm for India with respect to SAARC countries for the period 1990-2014. The paper uses the co-integration model to test the causal relationship between trade and output growth. Granger causality test is applied for the period 1994-2015 to examine the nature of relationship between variables under study. The results indicate absence of long term relationship between India’s GDP growth and trade among SAARC nations, thereby giving way to the existence of short term relationship. Granger causality revealed unidirectional nature of causality from exports to GDP and Imports to GDP for Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, GDP to export for Maldives, GDP to import for Bangladesh, Import to export for Bhutan and Sri Lanka and export to import for Pakistan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Business and EconomicsSame topicAgricultural Economics and PracticesFrench-language works237,207