MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948181319 · doi:10.1111/jbi.13609

Niche models do not predict experimental demography but both suggest dispersal limitation across the northern range limit of the scarlet monkeyflower (<i>Erythranthe cardinalis</i>)

2019· article· en· W2948181319 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthew Bayly, Amy L. Angert

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biogeography · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiological dispersalNicheEcological nicheEcologyRange (aeronautics)HabitatPopulationEnvironmental niche modellingSpecies distributionGeographyBiologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aim Geographical ranges largely reflect the projection of species’ environmental niches onto the landscape, but dispersal limitation can cause ranges to fall short of niche limits. Understanding the prevalence of niche and dispersal limitation is a fundamental problem in ecology and biogeography, and it is relevant in predicting climate‐driven range shifts. Dispersal limitation could also cause widely used ecological niche models (ENM), which relate records of occurrence to environmental predictors, to underestimate properties of the ecological niche. Using a combination of experimental transplants and ENM, we tested for (a) dispersal and niche limitation across a species’ range boundary and (b) associations between ENM predictions and population performance. Location Oregon, USA. Taxon Scarlet monkeyflower ( Erythranthe cardinalis ). Methods We created experimental populations within and beyond the northern range edge and used integral projection models (IPM) to infer potential population growth trajectories. We also built two classes of ecological niche models (ENM), one using climatic predictors and the other using fine‐scale stream habitat variables, to estimate habitat suitability across the northern range edge. Finally, we tested whether higher ENM suitability scores predict greater demographic performance. Results Consistent with dispersal limitation, experimental populations beyond the range were projected to persist or spread in three of four sites (compared to two of four sites within the range) and stream habitat ENM projected abundant suitable stream microhabitat within the species’ thermal envelope beyond the range edge. In contrast, climatic ENM suggested decreasing habitat suitability and availability at the northern range edge. Unexpectedly, higher climatic ENM scores were associated with negative population growth rates, while higher stream habitat ENM scores were unrelated to population growth. Main conclusions The northern range edge falls short of the species niche limit and is instead limited by dispersal into suitable habitat. Dispersal limitation caused correlative niche models to underestimate the climatic niche and to poorly predict demographic performance in a short‐term field study. These results highlight key challenges to applying predictions from correlative ENM to understanding range and niche limits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of BiogeographySame topicSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeFrench-language works237,207