MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948274948 · doi:10.11159/iccste19.187

Fiber interferometric system for vehicle monitoring near railway level crossings

2019· article· en· W2948274948 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Stanislav Kepák, Jakub Čubík, David Hrubý, Vladimír Vašinek

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinisterstvo Průmyslu a ObchoduMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
KeywordsInterferometryOptical fiberComputer scienceOpticsTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article describes the development of the vehicle monitoring system that is applicable in the vicinity of the railway level crossings. The proposed system is based on a Mach-Zehnder fiber interferometer sensor, which has a measurement arm embedded in the road surface. The sensor is passive and requires no electrical power at the installation site, immune electromagnetic interference, and is compatible with existing single-mode fiber infrastructure. Experimental measurements were focused on the response of sensors utilizing different mechanical structures of fiber loops, slow-moving vehicles, and sensor function in continuous snow cover. Installed optical fibers in the roadway are regularly monitored and evaluated for their durability. The results have shown that it is possible to detect individual vehicles but above all their axles, which opens the way for vehicle classification. The detection capability of the system is absolute even with continuous snow cover. For slow-moving vehicles, double axle detection occurred due to the longitudinal dimensions of the loop, which will be solved by the second generation of sensors. The resulting system will be installed on a selected railroad crossing as a complement to the existing camera system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.435
Threshold uncertainty score0.572

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207