MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948286049 · doi:10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_412_18

Prucalopride: A recently approved drug by the food and drug administration for chronic idiopathic constipation

2019· editorial· en· W2948286049 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rajiv Mahajan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research · 2019
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgonistPharmacologyAcetylcholineMedicineProkinetic agent5-HT4 receptorReceptorMyenteric plexusInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On December 14, 2018, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved prucalopride (trade name Motegrity) for chronic idiopathic constipation.[1] Prucalopride is a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 4 agonist (5-HT4 agonist), which was introduced to the market in 2009 and has been commercially available in Europe since 2010[2] and in Canada since 2011.[3] The main effect of prucalopride is to stimulate colonic motility, which explains its efficacy to treat constipated patients unresponsive to other regimens.[2] Chemically, prucalopride is 4-amino-5-chloro-N-[1-(3-methoxypropyl)piperidin-4-yl]-2,3-dihydro-1-benzofuran-7-carboxamide, butanedioic acid, with molecular formula of C22H32ClN3O7.[4] In vivo and in vitro studies revealed that prucalopride enhances the peristaltic reflex and propulsive motor patterns in the gastrointestinal tract via 5-HT4 receptor activation. In experimental studies, prucalopride has been shown to be highly selective for the 5-HT4 receptor showing a receptor affinity (Ki) of 8.7 nM, with in vitro affinity for other receptors and ion channels at least 150 times lower, suggesting a low potential for off-target effects.[3] In a range of in vitro studies on isolated gastrointestinal tissues from mouse, rat, guinea pig, dog, pig, and man, prucalopride facilitated the release of neurotransmitters. Depending on the location of the 5-HT4 receptor, these were acetylcholine from myenteric neurons leading to enhanced amplitude of contractions, calcitonin gene-related peptide and acetylcholine from intrinsic sensory neurons leading to stimulation of peristalsis, and nitric oxide from myenteric nerves leading to improved relaxation. All these actions resulted in improved propulsion in gastrointestinal tract. In several in vivo gastrointestinal motility studies, prucalopride was shown to stimulate gastrointestinal motility, with a pronounced effect on the large bowel.[3] The peak plasma concentration of prucalopride is attained within 0.3–1.5 h, with low plasma protein binding of 27%–37%. Prucalopride achieved highest tissue concentrations in the gastrointestinal tract, liver, kidney, adrenal gland, and lungs (>10 times than in plasma) in animal studies. Main metabolic pathways are through hydroxylation, O-demethylation, and N-glucuronide conjugation.[3] In three clinical trials, 12 weeks of prucalopride 2 and 4 mg/day treatment resulted in a significantly higher proportion of patients reaching the primary efficacy endpoint of an average of ≥3 spontaneous complete bowel movements compared to placebo. There was also significantly improved bowel habit and associated symptoms, and patient satisfaction with bowel habit and treatment, including patients with refractory constipation (>80% of trial patients).[567] Prucalopride (Motegrity) has been approved as 1 mg/2 mg once daily dose by the FDA. In clinical trials, suicide, suicide attempts, and suicide ideation have been reported, though no causal relationship could be established. Headache, abdominal pain, nausea, and diarrhea were the most common adverse effects reported in the clinical trials. Hypersensitivity; intestinal perforation or obstruction due to structural or functional disorder of the gut wall; obstructive ileus; and severe inflammatory conditions of the intestinal tract such as Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and toxic megacolon/megarectum are some of the contraindications to the use of prucalopride.[8] Prucalopride works similarly in men and women, without any racial or age difference. Even the occurrence of side effects was similar between patients younger than 65 years and 65 years or older.[9] In vitro studies have documented low potential of prucalopride in inhibition or induction of cytochrome enzymes and transporters.[8] Due to its few side effects, the lack of cardiovascular effects, and interactions with other drugs, prucalopride may be safely used in elderly people as well.[2]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.511
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Applied and Basic Medical ResearchSame topicGastrointestinal motility and disordersFrench-language works237,207