Modelling and Simulation of Lubricant Flow Fluid in Wet Friction Pair
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The lubricant flow field between the disks of the wet friction pair has been simulated under different lubricant inlet flow rate. The temperature changing on the surfaces of the disks during the wet friction pair operation is investigated. The temperature curve which was exported from the thermo-mechanical coupling simulation for the wet friction pair, is used to define the thermal field of the lubricant flow calculation filed. The viscosity-temperature characteristics of the lubricant is considered in this research as well. The simulation results of the lubricant flow fluid based on the different temperature and different flow velocity distribution show that grooves effect is the very important factor of the lubricant flow fluid. It is found that the flow velocity in the radial grooves and the zone near the walls contact to friction disk which has been grooved is larger while the temperature is lower. It is also shown that the temperature field and flow velocity field are distributing circularly and the closer to the outer edge the higher the flow rate and the higher the temperature is.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".