MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948319262 · doi:10.4324/9781315180076-1

Globalising the Easter Rising

2017· book-chapter· en· W2948319262 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Enrico Dal Lago, Róisín Healy, Gearóid Barry

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIrish and British Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This introductory chapter addresses the significance of the year 1916 in the decline of empires. It argues that the Easter Rising marked the beginning of a pivotal moment in the trajectory of anti-imperial activity set in motion by the pressures of World War I, which would culminate in the Russian Revolution of 1917. It focuses on the often-neglected global dimension of the Easter Rising as an event with roots in both the Irish diaspora and transnational intellectual contexts and with implications for places well beyond the island of Ireland. The chapter begins with a historiographical survey which acknowledges the wealth of scholarship situating the Easter Rising within the Irish, British-Irish and Irish-American contexts. It then argues for an expansion of horizons to include connections and comparisons with anti-colonial movements in other parts of the world, such as Australia, central Asia, French Canada, Scandinavia and South Africa. It explains how the combination of transnational and comparative methodological approaches distinguishes this volume from earlier examinations of both the Easter Rising and the year 1916. Finally, it outlines the various contributions that follow in the volume.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIrish and British StudiesFrench-language works237,207