Anti‐GM‐CSF therapy in psoriasis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Psoriasis is a long‐lasting disease involving inflammation of the skin. In the most common form of this disease ‐ plaque psoriasis ‐ the inflammation is visible as raised, reddened and often scaly areas which may extend widely over the body. Although not generally a life‐threatening condition, psoriasis may increase the risk of other serious disorders (such as cardiovascular disease), and often leads to much reduced quality of life for patients ‐ through physical discomfort (itching, pain), disability, and related emotional trauma. Furthermore, psoriasis occurs worldwide (affecting up to 3% of the populations in various countries) and cannot be completely cured by available treatments. Together, these issues make the disease a serious global burden. Granulocyte‐Macrophage Colony‐Stimulating Factor (GM‐CSF) is made in the body and is important in controlling functions of the body's immune system and the processes involved in inflammation. Therefore, this study was carried out to establish whether blocking the activities of GM‐CSF in patients with moderate or severe plaque psoriasis could result in significant improvement of the disease. In total, 122 patients were enrolled from Canada, Denmark, Germany, Latvia and Poland. The patients were treated over 10 weeks either with namilumab (GM‐CSF blocker) or a placebo (inactive): assessments of their psoriasis were made during this period, and completed after an additional 2 weeks. Notably, throughout the 12‐week study duration no significant improvement was detected for namilumab‐treated patients ‐ in marked contrast to treatment benefit found in a similar study involving patients with rheumatoid arthritis. These findings point to different roles for GM‐CSF in the two diseases, and suggest that blocking GM‐CSF activity alone is not enough for effective treatment of plaque psoriasis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".