MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948326990 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23520

Soft sensor modelling of acrolein conversion based on hidden Markov model of principle component analysis and fireworks algorithm

2019· article· en· W2948326990 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shuting Liu, Xianwen Gao, Hangfeng He, Wenhai Qi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAcroleinHidden Markov modelMarkov modelMarkov chainComponent (thermodynamics)Support vector machineAlgorithmComputer sciencePrincipal component analysisBiological systemSoft sensorMarkov processArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Process (computing)Machine learningMathematicsChemistryStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the existing propylene oxidation process, it is important to measure acrolein conversion for the production of acrylic acid. The gas chromatographic analyzer is generally used to analyze the acrolein conversion as an off‐line method. In this paper, a soft sensor modelling method of acrolein conversion based on the hidden Markov model with principle component analysis (PCA) and the fireworks algorithm (FWA) is proposed. Firstly, PCA is used to decrease the input variables of hidden Markov model. Then, FWA is applied to optimize the initial parameters of the hidden Markov model. Finally, the hidden Markov model based on PCA and the FWA is employed to predict the acrolein conversion. The proposed method is compared with the support vector machine (SVM), the artificial neural network (ANN), and the hidden Markov method (HMM) to show its superior performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207