MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948329942 · doi:10.4103/njo.njo_12_17

Presumed arachnoid cyst and acquired isolated third nerve palsy in a child-causal or incidental?

2017· article· en· W2948329942 on OpenAlexaff
SowmyaRaveendra Murthy, Kaushik Murali, MaheshP Shanmugham, Tejas Sankar

Bibliographic record

VenueNigerian Journal of Ophthalmology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOculomotor nerve palsyArachnoid cystPalsyOculomotor nerveMagnetic resonance imagingCystLesionNeuroimagingSurgeryRadiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arachnoid cysts and oculomotor palsy are rare occurrences in children. This report describes a case of acquired third cranial nerve palsy in a child, caused by compression of the oculomotor nerve by an arachnoid cyst. Nineteen-month-old female child presented with a history of squinting in the right eye. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed a small cystic lesion immediately adjacent to the cisternal segment of the oculomotor nerve. Immediate surgical intervention was deferred. Follow-up after 6 months showed progression of third nerve palsy with no change in size of the cyst. This case highlights the importance of performing neuroimaging to rule out the presence of compressive lesions in children with abnormal ocular motility and pupillary findings. Small insignificant lesions on MRI need to be followed up in such cases to explain the findings as in our case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNigerian Journal of OphthalmologySame topicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusFrench-language works237,207