MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948382160 · doi:10.36424/jpsb.v3i02.6

ADAPTASI MASYARAKAT DI TUAPEJAT KABUPATEN KEPULAUAN MENTAWAI PROPINSI SUMATERA BARAT

2018· article· en· W2948382160 on OpenAlexaff
Silvia Devi

Bibliographic record

VenueJURNAL PENELITIAN SEJARAH DAN BUDAYA · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural and Religious Practices in Indonesia
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyPopulationDemographySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mentawai is an area consisting of several islands. However, there is one island that was initially notoccupied by the Mentawai people. It was Sipora located exactly in Tuapejat. The island was originallyonly used as a stopover for people who cross the island. However, as the region expands and thensearches for the capital region of the Regency, Sipora Island is chosen as a strategic location for theMentawai people who are on another island. In the past, Mentawai was still part of Pariaman Regency.Then this region became one of the transmigration areas of the population both from West Sumatraitself and from the island of Java. Because of the first entry of transmigration, as well as the existenceof Mentawai people from other islands, they mixed together with a variety of customs and habits.Therefore this paper examines the forms of community adaptation in Tuapejat, Mentawai, West SumatraProvince. This paper uses qualitative approach. The data are collected through interview andobservation. The result of the research shows that there is good adaptation ability among the people inMentawai with the newcomers. The first proces of adaptation is done from the family environment. Theadoption of value is first done in the family before family members interact in the wider environmentsuch as the community. Religious and cultural differences are common in Tuapejat society, especiallyfor Mentawai people. Religious and cultural differences are not a problem among them because theygive priority to mutual respect and value for each difference.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJURNAL PENELITIAN SEJARAH DAN BUDAYASame topicCultural and Religious Practices in IndonesiaFrench-language works237,207