MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948391136 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23513

Active disturbance rejection generalized predictive control for a high purity distillation column process with time delay

2019· article· en· W2948391136 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Tianjin CityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsModel predictive controlControl theory (sociology)Fractionating columnIntegratorRobustness (evolution)DistillationProcess controlComputer scienceNonlinear systemProcess (computing)Control (management)Control engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High purity distillation processes have been widely used in the chemical industry. These processes have unique characteristics including higher order, nonlinearity, strong coupling, and time delay. In order to overcome these control issues, an active disturbance rejection generalized predictive control strategy is designed for the distillation column with time delay. The strategy combines the structures of both active disturbance rejection control and generalized predictive control. A delayed designed extended state observer can estimate the model uncertainty and external disturbance, and a non‐incremental generalized predictive control is proposed to deal with the integrators with time delay. Therefore, it rejects disturbances well and has the capability of overcoming time delay. The computation load is also less than the generalized predictive control. In the simulation experiments, the proposed strategy is compared with robust control and model predictive control. The results illustrate that the proposed control strategy has improved robustness performance in dealing with model uncertainties, various disturbances, and time delay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it