MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948406165 · doi:10.11159/ffhmt19.173

Simulations of Binary Particles Distributions in a Separated-Gasification Chemical Looping Combustion System

2019· article· en· W2948406165 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xudong Wang, Yali Shao

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemical looping combustionCombustionBinary numberMaterials scienceProcess engineeringThermodynamicsNuclear engineeringEnvironmental scienceChemistryPhysical chemistryPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chemical looping combustion is a promising non-flame combustion technology which can separate CO2 during combustion process without extra energy penalty Previous, a separated-gasification chemical looping combustion system was designed and constructed, which consisted of a gasifier (GR), a reduction reactor (RR) and an air reactor (AR) The results of hot operation showed satisfying CO2 yield. In order to know the detailed gas-solid flow characteristics, a threedimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was adopted to predict the multiphase hydrodynamics. In the cold operation of this system, there are three phases, gas, coarse sand particle and oxygen carrier. The sand particle bubbles in GR while the oxygen carrier circulated between RR and AR. The detailed operation mechanism of this system can be found in our previous work This work mainly focused on the distributions of binary particles in the system under variable conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass TransferSame topicChemical Looping and Thermochemical ProcessesFrench-language works237,207