Expanding the range of binding energies and oxidizability of biologically relevant S–aromatic interactions: imidazolium and phenolate binding to sulfoxide and sulfone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oxidation and protonation/deprotonation strongly impact intermolecular noncovalent interactions. For example, S-aromatic interactions are stabilized up to three-fold in the gas phase on oxidation of the sulfur ligand or protonation/deprotonation of the aromatic. To probe if such stabilizing effects are additive and to model interactions of oxidized methionine (MetOn) with protonated histidine and deprotonated tyrosine residues in proteins, we examined Me2SOn (n = 1, 2) binding to imidazolium, phenolate and their 4-methylated forms. Ab initio MP2(full)/6-311++G(d,p) gas-phase calculations reveal that the Me2SOn-imidazolium complexes adopt edge-on geometry with σ-type (N/C-HarO) H-bonding and interaction energies of -17.2 to -31.1 kcal mol-1. The less stable (-13.8 to -21.0 kcal mol-1) Me2SOn-phenolates possess en-face geometry stabilized by π-type (C-Hπar) H-bonding. Comparing these energies with those reported for the Me2S-neutral aromatics affirms the additive effects of ligand protonation/deprotonation and oxidation on gas-phase stability. However, this is not the case in water although the aqueous complexes retain their preferred gas-phase σ- and π-type H-bonded structures. Binding free energies (kcal mol-1) calculated from molecular dynamics simulations in bulk water (preceded by CHARMM36 force field calibration where necessary) reveal that Me2SO-imidazolium (-4.4) is more stable than Me2SO-phenolate (-2.4) but Me2SO2-imidazolium (-0.6) is less stable than Me2SO2-phenolate (-3.8). Vertical ionization potentials (IPV) calculated for the gas-phase complexes indicate that the Me2SOn-phenolates, but not the Me2SOn-imidazoles, are oxidizable under biological conditions. Charge transfer from the phenolate increases its IPV by ∼20%, decreasing its susceptibility to oxidation. Overall, this work provides fundamental data to predict the behaviour of protein-based MetOn-aromatic-ion interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".