Postoperative Imaging After Lobectomy: Predicting the Displacement and Change in Orientation of Nonresected Lung Nodules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the effect of a lobectomy to the location and orientation of nonresected lung nodule and its corresponding airway. METHODS: We reviewed preoperative and postoperative computed tomography of patients who underwent lobectomies and have a separate nonresected nodule in the ipsilateral lung. Displacement of the nonresected nodule and angulation of its corresponding segmental bronchus were measured. RESULTS: Fifty nodules from 40 patients (30 females, 10 male; mean ± SD age, 67 ± 7 years) were assessed. Nodules are displaced clockwise after right upper, right middle, and left lower lobectomies and counterclockwise after right lower and left upper lobectomies. Displacement of the remaining nodules was greater in the craniocaudal plane, followed by anteroposterior and transverses planes (mean, 3.7, 2.5, and 1.9 cm, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Remaining ipsilateral nodules and their associated segmental airways are displaced in a predictable fashion after lobectomy. This may help in the assessment of follow-up imaging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".