MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948416843 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.02359

All Terminal Reliability Roots of Smallest Modulus

2019· preprint· en· W2948416843 on OpenAlexaff
Jason I. Brown, Corey D. C. DeGagné

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReliability and Maintenance Optimization
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerminal (telecommunication)Reliability (semiconductor)ModulusMathematicsReliability engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsComputer networkGeometryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given a connected graph $G$ whose vertices are perfectly reliable and whose edges each fail independently with probability $q\in[0,1],$ the \textit{(all-terminal) reliability} of $G$ is the probability that the resulting subgraph of operational edges contains a spanning tree (this probability is always a polynomial in $q$). The location of the roots of reliability polynomials has been well studied, with particular interest in finding those with the largest moduli. In this paper, we will discuss a related problem -- among all reliability polynomials of graphs on $n$ vertices, which has a root of smallest modulus? We prove that, provided $n \geq 3$, the roots of smallest moduli occur precisely for the cycle graph $C_n$, and the root is unique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.132 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicReliability and Maintenance OptimizationFrench-language works237,207