MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948541102

LA COUR SUPREME FACE A LA VIE, FACE A LA MORT: DE VALEURS ET DE DROITS

2000· article· fr· W2948541102 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Suzanne Philips-Nootens

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Bar Review · 2000
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticultural Socio-Legal Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupreme courtAutonomyDignityContext (archaeology)LawFace (sociological concept)Political sciencePromotion (chess)Foundation (evidence)SociologyHistorySocial sciencePolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a result of the adoption of the Quebec and Canadian charters, the Supreme Court has been attributed the task of delineating our fundamental values . With regard to life,the fundamental issue relates to the unborn. Whether in the context of a planned termination of pregnancy or gestation leading to birth, legal recognition is attained and the rights of the child supercede those of its parents. According to the writer, the weaknesses inherent in the legal reasoning of the Court when confronted by this paradox result from its promotion of certain societal choices. As with life,so is it with death. Destined to protect the integrity of the person, an adult's autonomy undergoes limitations at the threshold of the unacceptable, that is to say regarding one's right to choose death. Lastly, as the foundation of all rights, the notion of human dignity is consecrated by the Court in a most praiseworthy decision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Bar ReviewSame topicMulticultural Socio-Legal StudiesFrench-language works237,207