MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948575103

Platonic Self-Knowledge and Democracy: The Best Case Scenario

2017· article· en· W2948575103 on OpenAlexaff
Duncan McManus

Bibliographic record

VenueStudent Research Proceedings · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicClassical Philosophy and Thought
Canadian institutionsMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemocracyInstitutionContradictionEconomic shortagePoliticsPolitical scienceRepresentative democracySociologyEpistemologyLawLaw and economicsPhilosophyGovernment (linguistics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is no shortage of scholarly options regarding Plato’s view of democracy; many of which believe Plato was opposed to democratic regimes. Among the potential problems Plato may have had with democracy the inability of the democratic city to provide its citizens with self-knowledge would be high on the list. The democrats love of freedom and continual satisfaction of unnecessary desires inevitably lead to a contradiction of their words in their deeds. That being said the democratic love of freedom and the institution it leads to are likely the best hope for those hoping to acquire self knowledge. Discipline: Political Science Honours Faculty Mentor: Dr. Gaelan Murphy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0080.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.215
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudent Research ProceedingsSame topicClassical Philosophy and ThoughtFrench-language works237,207