Geological Studies in the Eastern Indian Ocean: Cruise SO258/1 of the R/V Sonne (Germany) with the Participation of Russian Researchers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cruise SO258/1 of the R/V Sonne (Germany) along a route from Fremantle, Australia, to Colombo, Sri Lanka, was carried out between June 7 and July 9, 2017 for geological and biological research in the Eastern Indian Ocean. The scientific staff included 33 researchers from ten countries (Germany, Australia, USA, UK, Switzerland, France, Taiwan, Canada, Russia, Norway). Two Russian scientists participated on this cruise: O. V. Levchenko and Y. G. Marinova from the Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences (IORAS), studying the problems of regional geology. This brief article provides information on geological research, which was led by the chief scientist of the cruise R. Werner, senior researcher from GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research (Kiel, Germany). \n \nThe complete report on the expedition is available on the GEOMAR website [4]. Cruise SO258/1 was part of the research project INGON (INDIAN–ANTARCTIC BREAK-UP ENGIMA). The main objective of the INGON project was to study the magmatic and tectonic processes that cause and accompany the breakup of continents and the formation of oceanic basins on the example of the India–Antarctica breakup about 150 Ma ago. The project is executed by the GEOMAR and the Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI) Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research (Bremerhaven). GEOMAR performed bathymetric survey and sampling of submarine rises and seamounts in the Eastern the Indian Ocean in the first “geological” leg (cruise SO258/1). AWI performed geophysical survey (magnetometry, gravimetry, multichannel seismic profiling, deep seismic sounding) in the Central Indian Basin in the second “geophysical” leg (cruise SO258/2).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".