Therapeutic effects of soluble guanylate cyclase stimulation on pulmonary hemodynamics and emphysema development in guinea pigs chronically exposed to cigarette smoke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have analyzed the effect of the soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulator BAY 41-2272 in a therapeutic intervention in guinea pigs chronically exposed to cigarette smoke (CS). The effects of sGC stimulation on respiratory function, pulmonary hemodynamics, airspace size, vessel remodeling, and inflammatory cell recruitment to the lungs were evaluated in animals that had been exposed to CS for 3 mo. CS exposure was continued for an additional 3 mo in half of the animals and withdrawn in the other half. Animals that stopped CS exposure had slightly lower pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and right ventricle (RV) hypertrophy than those who continued CS exposure, but they did not recover from the emphysema and the inflammatory cell infiltrate. Conversely, oral BAY 41-2272 administration stopped progression or even reversed the CS-induced emphysema in both current and former smokers, respectively. Furthermore, BAY 41-2272 produced a reduction in the RV hypertrophy, which correlated with a decrease in the PAP values. By contrast, the degree of vessel remodeling induced by CS remained unchanged in the treated animals. Functional network analysis suggested perforin/granzyme pathway downregulation as an action mechanism capable of stopping the progression of emphysema after sGC stimulation. The pathway analysis also showed normalization of the expression of cGMP-dependent serine/kinases. In conclusion, in guinea pigs chronically exposed to CS, sGC stimulation exerts beneficial effects on the lung parenchyma and the pulmonary vasculature, suggesting that sGC stimulators might be a potential alternative for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treatment that deserves further evaluation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".