An Alternative Interpretation for the Origin of Black Shale in the Bakken Formation of the Williston Basin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Recently, most researchers have argued for a deep-water origin for black shale in the Bakken Formation of the Williston basin based on sedimentology, paleontology and geochemistry characteristics that place black, laminated, sparsely fossiliferous, radiolarian, pyritic shale as the seaward lithology in an assemblage that originally transitioned landward into shallow-water facies. The shallow-water interpretation advocated in this paper is based on stratigraphic characteristics that include the absence of strata that represent a landward equivalent to the shale, gradual landward shale pinchouts, the restriction of Bakken strata to basinal areas, the Bakken onlap depositional style, and placement of a major maximum flooding surface near the base of the overlying Lodgepole. Black mud deposition in the Bakken is interpreted to have occurred in a low-relief, semi-enclosed, epeiric-lagoon environment with typical water depths of 0–30 m. It is theorized that a high-rainfall climate caused salinity stratification that produced bottom-water anoxia, which preserved organic material. Perhumid climate conditions (year-round rainfall) fostered thick soils and dense vegetation that limited sediment release and induced mud-dominated, sand-poor deposition. During middle Bakken deposition, an arid to semi-arid climate eliminated the bottom-water anoxic conditions and caused carbonate-siliciclastic deposition. The abrupt vertical transitions from black shale (lower Bakken), to carbonate-siliciclastic lithologies (middle Bakken), to black shale (upper Bakken) were caused by paleoclimate change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".