MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948688782 · doi:10.1149/2.0441911jes

Transient Potential Induced Anodic Dissolution of 316L Stainless Steel in Sulfuric Acid Solution

2019· article· en· W2948688782 on OpenAlexafffund
Yuan-Yuan Hong, Xian-Zong Wang, Ken Cadien, Jing‐Li Luo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsDissolutionMaterials scienceTransient (computer programming)AnodeProton exchange membrane fuel cellElectrolytePulse (music)CorrosionSulfuric acidComposite materialAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ElectrodeMetallurgyChemistryMembraneVoltageElectrical engineeringChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transient potentials, originating from the dynamic loading during the operation of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), could induce severe corrosion of metallic bipolar plates under the aggressive working conditions of PEMFCs. In this study, square wave potential pulses, with the upper potential limit of 0.7 V vs. Ag/AgCl and the pulse potential limits from 0.6 to 0.3 V, are applied to 316L stainless steel (316L SS) in 5 mM H 2 SO 4 + 2 ppm NaF at 70°C to simulate the potential variations. Results show that transient potentials enhance the anodic dissolution of 316L SS. A more negative pulse potential generates a much higher frequency of passive film breakdown events than that generated by a more positive pulse potential during the cyclic pulse tests. Analysis of the electronic properties of the passive films suggests that the disorder degree of the passive film formed at different pulse potentials is strongly associated with these breakdown events; a protective passive film with less localized states is beneficial to mitigate the dissolution induced by the transient potentials. The development of bipolar plates with less defective surface structure and assessment of its performance under transient potentials are necessary for improving PEMFC durability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207