MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948713859 · doi:10.7202/1059933ar

Les voies indonésiennes de la Belt and Road Initiative

2019· article· fr· W2948713859 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Delphine Allès, Éric Frécon

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes internationales · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Relations and Foreign Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En analysant le volet indonésien de la Belt and Road Initiative ( bri ), cet article montre les apports croisés de l’étude des (mis)perceptions et de leurs usages en politique étrangère, et d’une approche décentrée des Relations internationales. La mise en récit de la bri fait écho à la représentation d’une émergence chinoise vouée à s’imposer unilatéralement. Sa mise en oeuvre dans l’archipel est pourtant incrémentale et largement soumise à l’agenda politique indonésien. La misperception est néanmoins entretenue par Pékin et Jakarta, car elle sert leurs agendas respectifs. L’interdépendance asymétrique entre les deux États paraît renforcée par ce projet, qui invite à consolider le concept d’ambiguïté stratégique et à ancrer l’analyse des relations internationales dans l’observation de leurs effets localisés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes internationalesSame topicInternational Relations and Foreign PolicyFrench-language works237,207