MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948722157 · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab1d50

Dust Production of Comet 21P/Giacobini–Zinner throughout Its 2018 Apparition

2019· article· en· W2948722157 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCometProduction rateComet dustMeteoroidMeteor (satellite)Atmosphere (unit)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present the results of a long-term telescopic observation campaign of comet 21P/Giacobini–Zinner, parent body of the Draconid meteor shower, spanning ∼240 days during its 2018 apparition. Determinations of comet 21P’s dust production rate through the Afρ parameter derived from these images show that the comet had a highly asymmetric dust production rate that peaked ∼10–30 days before perihelion, when the comet was at a heliocentric distance of ∼1.02–1.08 au. The single highest Afρ measurement occurred on 2018 August 14 (27 days before perihelion), and had a measured value of Afρ = 1594 cm. The comet’s Afρ profile is well described by a double-exponential model that rises rapidly during ingress and declines even more rapidly during its egress. These results are fully consistent with observations of comet 21P’s dust and gas production rates during past apparitions, and suggest that the double-exponential model we have derived provides a reasonable and stable approximation for the comet’s activity over the past 30 to 40 years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207