MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948732578 · doi:10.1520/acem20180124

Sustainable, Hydraulic-Lime-Limestone Binders for Construction

2019· article· en· W2948732578 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Civil Engineering Materials · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete and Cement Materials Research
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLimeFlexural strengthCompressive strengthMaterials scienceAluminatePortland cementMortarCementCalcium carbonateCalcium silicateCalcium silicate hydrateComposite materialMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This work intends to reduce the carbon footprint and increase the sustainability of hydraulic lime (HL) mortars and concretes, a growing market in both new building and refurbishment, by partially replacing HL with limestone. Limestone cements are widely used in the world. Portland cement (PC) is partially replaced with limestone to reduce the large carbon print of cement and improve sustainability. The effect of limestone in PC has been widely investigated; however, the effect of limestone in HL has not yet been investigated. HLs contain clinkers identical to those in PC; therefore, this article first reviews the effect of limestone in PC and then experimentally investigates its impact in HL. The results showed that limestone is active in HL. The limestone changed the microstructure of the HL paste and the nature of the phases formed upon hydration, with calcium carbosilicate hydrates (resulting from dicalcium silicate and calcium carbonate [C2S-CaCO3] reaction) and carboaluminate hydrates (resulting from tricalcium aluminate and calcium carbonate [C3A-CaCO3] reaction) growing on interfaces and in the matrix. Limestone replacement enhanced the performance of the HL by improving strength: a 10 % replacement increased HL strength (compressive by 36 % and flexural by 56 %). A 20 % replacement enhanced strength up to 125 and 40 days (compressive and flexural, respectively); therefore, the limestone replacement threshold is higher in HL than in PC. The rise in strength does not affect moisture and vapor permeability, and the composites remain ‘breathable.’ Contrary to PC, limestone reduces the water demand of HL mortars. The superior strength of the limestone-filled HL mortars is attributed to their lower water demand, an increase of early hydrates, and their placement—strengthening transition zones and interparticle links.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it