MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948744549 · doi:10.2337/db19-1482-p

1482-P: Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Management in Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases (ASCVD) and Preexisting Diabetes in Alberta, Canada

2019· article· en· W2948744549 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Guanmin Chen, Megan S. Farris, Tara Cowling, Ming‐Hui Tai, Lionel Pinto, Stephen Colgan, Raina M. Rogoza, Todd J. Anderson

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiabetes mellitusInternal medicineGuidelineMyocardial infarctionAtherosclerotic cardiovascular diseaseStatinHeart failureCholesterolRetrospective cohort studyDiseaseCardiologyEndocrinologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) reduces the risk of CV events, however, limited real-world data exist on the management of LDL-C in patients with ASCVD and pre-existing diabetes in Canada. Our study describes the clinical characteristics and LDL-C management of patients with ASCVD and diabetes using health system data in Alberta. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted linking multiple health system datasets to examine clinical characteristics and LDL-C levels in those receiving LLT (e.g., statins) after the first LDL-C test. Patients with ASCVD were identified using ICD diagnostic codes between 2011-2015. Similarly, diabetes status was assessed in the year prior to ASCVD diagnosis. LDL-C was assessed at the first (index) and second (follow-up) tests during the study period. LDL-C levels were evaluated based on a threshold of 2.0 mmol/L, as per the 2016 Canadian blood cholesterol management guidelines. Results: Among 144,607 patients with ASCVD and a prescription for LLT (mean age=66.3; 66% male), 27,540 (19.0%) patients were identified with diabetes. Patients with diabetes were more likely to have stroke, myocardial infarction, or peripheral arterial disease. Congestive heart failure and hypertension were found in 26.8% and 87.8% of patients with diabetes compared to 12.5% and 71.5% in those without, respectively. Of the patients with diabetes who had an index and follow-up LDL-C test (n=18,214), 35.0% (n=6,380) did not achieve the guideline specified LDL-C threshold at index. At follow-up (mean=238.9 days after index), 49.0% (n=3,129) of those who did not achieve threshold at index failed to meet the threshold. Conclusions: Nearly half of patients above the LDL-C threshold at the index test did not achieve threshold at the follow-up test, despite receiving LLT. Multifaceted interventions may be required to improve cholesterol management of patients with ASCVD and diabetes in Alberta. Disclosure G. Chen: Consultant; Self; Medlior Health Outcomes Research Ltd. M.S. Farris: Employee; Self; Medlior Health Outcomes Research Ltd. T. Cowling: Stock/Shareholder; Self; Medlior Health Outcomes Research Ltd. M. Tai: Employee; Self; Amgen Inc. L. Pinto: Employee; Self; Amgen Inc. S. Colgan: Employee; Self; Amgen Inc. R. Rogoza: Employee; Self; Amgen Inc. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Amgen Inc. T.J. Anderson: None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthFrench-language works237,207