CONVERSE TRENDS OF THE TERRESTRIAL AND GROUND WATER STORAGE CHANGES IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. We study the terrestrial water storage (TWS) and groundwater storage (GWS) changes in Canada and United States. We employ the separation approach from Wang et al. (2013) together with the improved GRACE data of Release 6 for a longer time span until December, 2016. The TWS signals from lake levels are derived from satellite altimetry data over the lakes while TWS signals due to soil moisture (SM) and snow water equivalent (SWE) changes from hydrology models. There are four significant trend anomalies in North America for both TWS and GWS changes. Two positive anomalies are found in Canada with their centers in the provinces of Saskatchewan and Quebec, respectively, due to increased precipitation and/or increased runoff in their surroundings. Two negative anomalies are shown in the United States with their centers in California and the northwest of Texas, respectively, which are due to decreased precipitation and, especially for California, high water usage for agriculture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".