Production and Physical and Physicochemical Characterization Powder in Natura and Freeze-Dried of Moringa Seeds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To apply low temperatures, different of other processes, maintain the structure of products and better preserve the thermosensitive components, the freeze-drying has called attention of various researchers. Aimed with the research to produce and characterize the powder in natura obtained by seeds of moringa, elaborate different pastes with addiction of 20, 30, 40 and 50 mL of distilled water, freeze-dry it, characterize it physical and physicochemical and select the best powder. The freeze-drying was produced through a benchtop freeze dryer. After drying it, from the powder were determined the real density, bulk density, compacted density, porosity, compressibility index, Hausner factor, hygroscopicity, solubility, color, moisture content and water activity, ashes, total acidity, pH, proteins, lipids and carbohydrates. The in natura powder was classified as non-hygroscopic, high solubility in water, low moisture content and water activity, high protein, lipids, carbohydrates and low acidity. Freeze-drying was presented as an appropriate method for the preservation of moringa constituents, with a formula selected with the addition of 50 mL of water.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".