MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948869800 · doi:10.1090/proc/15232

Asymptotic normality for random simplices and convex bodies in high dimensions

2020· preprint· en· W2948869800 on OpenAlexaff
David Alonso–Gutiérrez, Florian Besau, Julian Grote, Zakhar Kabluchko, Matthias Reitzner, Christoph Thäle, Beatrice-Helen Vritsiou, Elisabeth M. Werner

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the American Mathematical Society · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicPoint processes and geometric inequalities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersGobierno de AragónMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsIndependent and identically distributed random variablesCombinatoricsRegular polygonMeasure (data warehouse)Central limit theoremBall (mathematics)Asymptotic distributionProbability measureRandom variableDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysisGeometryEstimatorComputer scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Central limit theorems for the log-volume of a class of random convex bodies in R n \mathbb {R}^n are obtained in the high-dimensional regime, that is, as n → ∞ n\to \infty . In particular, the case of random simplices pinned at the origin and simplices where all vertices are generated at random is investigated. The coordinates of the generating vectors are assumed to be independent and identically distributed with subexponential tails. In addition, asymptotic normality is also established for random convex bodies (including random simplices pinned at the origin) when the spanning vectors are distributed according to a radially symmetric probability measure on the n n -dimensional ℓ p \ell _p -ball. In particular, this includes the cone and the uniform probability measure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.038
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.038
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.008
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicPoint processes and geometric inequalitiesFrench-language works237,207