MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Flexible Virtual Energy Sharing by Distributed Task Reallocation in IoT Edge Networks

2018· article· en· W2948875137 on OpenAlexaff
Ruitao Chen, Xianbin Wang, Shuran Sheng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputation offloadingEnergy consumptionEdge computingDistributed computingServerShared resourceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionEdge deviceLatency (audio)WorkloadEfficient energy useTask (project management)ComputationComputer networkCloud computingInternet of ThingsEmbedded systemOperating systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The convergence of Internet of Things (IoT) and edge computing provides a promising solution to many distributed IoT applications, which often involve real-time information gathering and complex processing. However, energy consumption of computational-intensive processing at edge devices becomes a main constraint due to limited battery capacity. In addressing this, computation offloading to a remote server has been utilized but leading to potentially increased latency due to network delay. In this paper, we propose a virtual energy sharing among edge IoT devices through a collaborative computing mechanism by a flexible and situation-dependent computation task reallocation coordinated by a smart gateway. Our key objective is to achieve energy aware task executions and energy sharing among collaborative edge devices by flexibly adjusting task volumes and CPU frequency based on the workload conditions. To implement this, trade-off between energy consumption and computation time of two collaborative edge devices is formulated to achieve a flexible and situation-dependent decision-making considering the time-varying resource conditions and application delay tolerance. Simulation results show that the proposed scheme could achieve a flexible virtual energy sharing by managing the trade-off between resource utilization and latency performance of tasks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207