LINE‐1 methylation in cleft lip tissues: Influence of infant <i>MTHFR</i> c.677C>T genotype
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of MTHFR c.677C>T genotype on LINE-1 methylation in lateral and medial tissues from cleft lip (CL). METHODS: Forty-five consecutive non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (nsCL/P) cases were included in the study. Genomic DNA was extracted from tissues at both sides of cleft lip, and LINE-1 methylation was detected by bisulfite conversion and pyrosequencing. MTHFR c.677C>T genotyping was carried out using the TaqMan genotyping assay. RESULTS: LINE-1 methylation level was significantly higher on medial side of cleft lip compared with lateral side (p = 0.001). This difference was not significantly influenced by the case's sex or cleft type. However, MTHFR c.677C>T genotyping revealed that the difference in LINE-1 methylation across cleft lip was restricted to carriers of C allele of MTHFR c.677C>T and was not apparent in TT homozygous cases (p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: This integrated analysis supports the previous finding of differences in DNA methylation across the two sides of cleft lip and further suggests a possible role of MTHFR c.677C>T genotype in establishing this difference.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".