Rhus trilobata: Worthy Plant Seeks Worthy Name
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Saddled with common names like skunkbush, stinking sumac, and ill-scented sumac, Rhus trilobata is clearly a shrub in need of a good public relations agent.Those unflattering names refer to the strong scent its foliage and stems emit when crushed.Ignore the unappealing monikers, and you will find that its ornamental and environmental assets are more than sufficient to make R. trilobata a valuable landscape plant.Rhus trilobata has a wide native range in western North America, reaching from the Canadian province of Saskatchewan south to Texas and Mexico but skipping the moist coastal areas of the Pacific Northwest.It grows in many ecological regions, from the Great Plains grasslands to mountain shrubland, chapparal, and forest areas, and is found in association with numerous species of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs as well as with grasses and forbs.Within its native range this deciduous shrub can grow from two to twelve feet tall, with four to six feet being typical in most landscape settings; its height is determined in part A lemonade-like drink can be made from the attractive red fruits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it