MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948900487 · doi:10.2316/j.2019.206-0231

VISION-BASED MOBILE ROBOT LEADER–FOLLOWER CONTROL USING MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL

2019· article· en· W2948900487 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tongying Guo, Haichen Wang, Yong Liu, Ming Li, Ying Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robotics and Automation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel predictive controlMobile robotControl (management)Computer scienceRobot controlRobotControl theory (sociology)Control engineeringArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leader–follower control of mobile robots has been an attractive topic in the robotics community. In this paper, a vision-based leader– follower tracking control system is presented using two autonomous mobile robots and model predictive control (MPC). In particular, the follower robot employs a vision sensor and a laser scanner to acquire the distance and orientation information between the leader robot and the follower. Then, the extended Kalman filter algorithm is employed to remove the measurement noise. A vision-based model predictive control (MPC) method for nonholonomic mobile robots is proposed to implement a reliable leader–follower tracking control. The simulation results under different control horizons are provided to validate the proposed control strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Robotics and AutomationSame topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207