Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Temptation of Christ at Plaimpied revisited Since Paul Deschamps published the capital of the Temptation of Christ in 1932, the close stylistic relationship to the Nazareth capitals has been universally recognised. Here, the capital and other newly discovered fragments at Plaimpied (perhaps from the cloister ?) are examined in terms of the sequence of building of the abbey church ; a date in the second quarter or middle years of the twelfth century is proposed on the basis of a charter and surviving epitaphs. The sources of the sculptor’s style can be found in the Middle Rhône valley and a mutilated tympanum at Saint-Médard-en-Forez is added to his portofolio. An appendix presents a critique of the state of the question in relation to the famous capitals at Nazareth. A curious afterlife around the time of the appearence of Deschamps article is not without interest : it inspired three ivories and a bas-relief, all evidently fakes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it