MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948963696 · doi:10.1134/s0031918x19040124

Archeometallographic Study of Cast-Iron Products Produced at the Kamensk Plants in the First Quarter of the 18th Century

2019· article· en· W2948963696 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
В. М. Счастливцев, B. A. Gizhevsky, Yu. V. Khlebnikova, С. В. Наумов, Е. И. Патраков

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Physics of Metals and Metallography · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMetallurgy and Cultural Artifacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCast ironMetallurgyBlast furnaceQuarter (Canadian coin)Pig ironMaterials scienceSteelmakingArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we continued a metallographic study of a number of old products produced in the Urals in the early 18th century, i.e., in the period of transition from handicraft damp-blow technology to blast-furnace production of cast iron and two-stage process of iron and steel production. The results of the study of the microstructure and chemical composition of cast-iron products of the Kamensk cast-iron and iron-works plant, as well the features of their production have been presented and discussed. This paper is attributed to the field of archeometallography.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.619
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Physics of Metals and MetallographySame topicMetallurgy and Cultural ArtifactsFrench-language works237,207