Theoretical Study on Structures and Aromaticities of P<sub>5</sub><sup>-</sup>Anion, [Ti (<i>η</i><sup>5</sup>-P<sub>5</sub>)]<sup>-</sup>and Sandwich Complex [Ti(<i>η</i><sup>5</sup>-P<sub>5</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2-</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The equilibrium geometries, energies, harmonic vibrational frequencies, and nucleus independent chemical shifts (NICSs) of the ground state of P5(-) (D(5h)) anion, the [Ti (eta(5)-P5)]- fragment (C(5v)), and the sandwich complex [Ti(eta(5)-P5)2]2- (D(5h) and D(5d)) are calculated by the three-parameter fit of the exchange-correlation potential suggested by Becke in conjunction with the LYP exchange potential (B3LYP) with basis sets 6-311+G(2d) (for P) and 6-311+G(2df) (for Ti). In each of the three molecules, the P-P and Ti-P bond distances are perfectly equal: five P atoms in block P5(-) lie in the same plane; the P-P bond distance increases and the Ti-P bond distance decreases with the order P5(-), [Ti(eta(5)-P5)2]2-, and [Ti (eta(5)-P5)]-. The binding energy analysis, which is carried out according to the energy change of hypothetic reactions of the three species, predicts that the three species are all very stable, and [Ti (eta(5)-P5)]- (C(5v)), more stable than P5(-) and [Ti(eta(5)-P5)2]2- synthesized in the experiment, could be synthesized. NICS values, computed for the anion and moiety of the three species with GIAO-B3LYP, reveal that the three species all have a larger aromaticity, and NICS (0) of moiety, NICS (1) of moiety, and minimum NICS of the inner side of ring P5 plane in magnitude increase with the order P5(-), [Ti(eta(5)-P5)2]2-, and [Ti (eta(5)-P5)]-. By analysis of the binding energetic and the molecular orbital (MO) and qualitative MO correlation diagram, and the dissection of total NICS, dissected as NICS contributions of various bonds, it is the main reason for P5(-) (D(5h)) having the larger aromaticity that the P-P sigma bonds, and pi bonds have the larger diatropic ring currents in which NICS contribution are negative, especially the P-P sigma bond. However, in [Ti (eta(5)-P5)]- (C(5v)) and [Ti(eta(5)-P5)2]2- (D(5h), and D(5d)), the reason is the larger and more negative diatropic ring currents in which the NICS contributions of P-P pi bonds and P5-Ti bonds including pi, delta, and sigma bonds, especially P5-Ti bonds, are much more negative and canceled the NICS contributions of P and Ti core and lone pair electrons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".