MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2949064006 · doi:10.9778/cmajo.20180189

Characteristics of patients vaccinated against influenza in physician offices versus pharmacies and predictors of vaccination location: a cross-sectional study

2019· article· en· W2949064006 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Nancy M. Waite, Suzanne M. Cadarette, Michael A. Campitelli, Giulia P. Consiglio, Sherilyn K. D. Houle, Jeffrey C. Kwong

Bibliographic record

VenueCMAJ Open · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCross-sectional studyPharmacyMedicineVaccinationFamily medicineVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Little is known about those vaccinated against influenza after pharmacists were added to the Ontario Universal Influenza Immunization Program, in 2012. Our aim was to identify characteristics of patients vaccinated against influenza and predictors of vaccination at a physician's office versus a community pharmacy. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of Ontario residents who had a record of receipt of an influenza vaccine between October and March in the 2013/14 and 2015/16 influenza seasons in Ontario using health administrative databases. We used Poisson regression models to estimate associations between baseline characteristics and the receipt of influenza vaccination in a community pharmacy. All analyses were stratified by age group (≤ 65 yr or ≥ 66 yr). RESULTS: Overall, we found a 7.9% decrease in vaccinations administered in 2015/16 (2 454 178) compared to 2013/14 (2 677 278). The number of patients vaccinated in community pharmacies increased between the 2 periods (757 729 [28.3%] in 2013/14 v. 859 794 [35.0%] in 2015/16). Living in nonurban areas or higher-income neighbourhoods, not identifying as an immigrant, not having a diagnosis of diabetes or hypertension, and receiving a pharmacist service on the same day as the vaccination were predictors of being vaccinated in a pharmacy, regardless of age group. Among patients aged 66 or more, those who had a hospital admission in the previous year were more likely to be vaccinated in a pharmacy than in a physician's office (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.09), whereas those with higher annual medication costs were more likely to be vaccinated in a physician's office. The location of the previous season's vaccination predicted the current season's place of vaccination (age ≥ 66 yr: physician's office: adjusted IRR 0.56 [95% CI 0.56-0.57], pharmacy: adjusted IRR 2.37 [95% CI 2.35-2.39]; age ≤ 65 yr: physician's office: adjusted IRR 0.57 [95% CI 0.57-0.57], pharmacy: adjusted IRR 2.19 [95% CI 2.18-2.20]). INTERPRETATION: For the 2013/14 and 2015/16 influenza seasons, the influenza vaccine was administered more frequently in physician offices than in community pharmacies, but the proportion of patients vaccinated in community pharmacies increased between the 2 periods. Physicians and pharmacists can encourage patients to take advantage of the availability of influenza vaccines across various settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCMAJ OpenSame topicInfluenza Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207