Bibliographic record
Abstract
Let $\mathfrak{g}$ be a simple complex Lie algebra and let $\mathfrak{t} \subset \mathfrak{g}$ be a toral subalgebra of $\mathfrak{g}$. As a $\mathfrak{t}$-module $\mathfrak{g}$ decomposes as \[\mathfrak{g} = \mathfrak{s} \oplus \big(\oplus_{ν\in \mathcal{R}} \mathfrak{g}^ν\big)\] where $\mathfrak{s} \subset \mathfrak{g}$ is the reductive part of a parabolic subalgebra of $\mathfrak{g}$ and $\mathcal{R}$ is the Kostant root system associated to $\mathfrak{t}$. When $\mathfrak{t}$ is a Cartan subalgebra of $\mathfrak{g}$ the decomposition above is nothing but the root decomposition of $\mathfrak{g}$ with respect to $\mathfrak{t}$; in general the properties of $\mathcal{R}$ resemble the properties of usual root systems. In this note we study the following problem: "Given a subset $\mathcal{S} \subset \mathcal{R}$, is there a parabolic subalgebra $\mathfrak{p}$ of $\mathfrak{g}$ containing $\mathcal{M} = \oplus_{ν\in \mathcal{S}} \mathfrak{g}^ν$ and whose reductive part equals $\mathfrak{s}$?". Our main results is that, for a classical simple Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ and a saturated $\mathcal{S} \subset \mathcal{R}$, the condition $(\operatorname{Sym}^\cdot(\mathcal{M}))^{\mathfrak{s}} = \mathbf{C}$ is necessary and sufficient for the existence of such a $\mathfrak{p}$. In contrast, we show that this statement is no longer true for the exceptional Lie algebras $\mathrm{F}_4, \mathrm{E}_6, \mathrm{E}_7$, and $\mathrm{E}_8$. Finally, we discuss the problem in the case when $\mathcal{S}$ is not saturated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".