MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2949122340

Cytotoxic 4'-aminochalcones and related compounds.

2003· article· en· W2949122340 on OpenAlexaff
J.R. Dimmock, Amitabh Jha, Gordon A. Zello, Theresa M. Allen, C.L. Santos, Jan Balzarini, Erik De Clercq, Elias K. Manavathu, J. P. Stables

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and biological activity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCytotoxicityCytotoxic T cellArylChemistryStereochemistryToxicityIC50In vitroPiChemical synthesisPharmacologyBiochemistryBiologyOrganic chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A series of 4'-aminochalcones 1 and related maleamic acids 2 and Schiff bases 3 were designed and synthesized as candidate cytotoxic agents. The atomic charges on different atoms of representative compounds were calculated. Evaluation of the enones 1-3 against human Molt 4/C8 and CEM T-lymphocytes as well as murine P388 and L1210 leukemic cells revealed that approximately 40% of the IC50 values generated were less than 10 microM. In some cases cytotoxicity was correlated with the Hammett sigma values of the aryl substituents and less frequently with the aryl Hansch pi values. Evidence was obtained that in general these compounds displayed selective toxicity for certain malignant cells and were well tolerated in mice. This study has revealed various directions whereby the project may be amplified in the future with a view to finding compounds with increased cytotoxicity to tumour cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicSynthesis and biological activityFrench-language works237,207