Features of the Development of the Effective and Reflective Component of Students’ Civic Engagement at the University
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article deals with the features of the development of the effective and reflective component of civic engagement of university students after leadership training. The characteristics of the levels (insufficient, initial, sufficient and creative) of the effective and reflexive component of the inquired quality are presented. During the search phase of the pedagogical experiment, we determined the pedagogical conditions that should positively affect the efficiency of the formation of civic activity of university students. These conditions include: reliance on the internal needs of the student, the use of modern ICT, the content and methodological support of the work of student supervisors, the organization and conduct of leadership training. The dynamics of the levels of the effective and reflexive component of student civic engagement before and after the formative experiment are clearly illustrated. The content and characteristics of the levels of civic engagement (insufficient, initial, sufficient and creative) are defined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it