MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2949126532 · doi:10.1051/epjconf/201921207002

The NNbar and multihadron production at the threshold at VEPP2000

2019· article· en· W2949126532 on OpenAlexaff
E. P. Solodov, R.R. Akhmetshin, Artem Amirkhanov, A. V. Anisenkov, V.M. Aulchenko, V.Sh. Banzarov, N.S. Bashtovoy, D. E. Berkaev, A. Bondar, A.V. Bragin, S.I. Eidelman, D. Epifanov, L.B. Epshteyn, A.L. Erofeev, G.V. Fedotovich, S.E. Gayazov, A.A. Grebenuk, S.S. Gribanov, D. N. Grigoriev, F.V. Ignatov, V. L. Ivanov, S.V. Karpov, V. F. Kazanin, I. A. Koop, A. N. Kirpotin, A. Korobov, A. Kozyrev, E.A. Kozyrev, P. Krokovny, A.E. Kuzmenko, A. Kuzmin, I.B. Logashenko, P.A. Lukin, K. Mikhailov, V.S. Okhapkin, Yu.N. Pestov, Alexander Popov, G.P. Razuvaev, Yu. A. Rogovsky, A.A. Ruban, N.M. Ryskulov, A.E. Ryzhenenkov, A. Semenov, Yu. M. Shatunov, P. Yu. Shatunov, V. Shebalin, D.N. Shemyakin, B. Shwartz, D. B. Shwartz, A.L. Sibidanov, В.М. Титов, A. A. Talyshev, A.I. Vorobiov, I. M. Zemlyansky, Yu. V. Yudin

Bibliographic record

VenueEPJ Web of Conferences · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsCross section (physics)AmplitudeResonance (particle physics)Nuclear physicsHadronNucleonDrop (telecommunication)Scattering cross-sectionAtomic physicsOpticsTelecommunicationsScatteringQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A study of hadron production at the nucleon-antinucleon threshold has been performed with the CMD-3 detector at the VEPP-2000 e+e− collider. A very fast rise with an about 1 MeV width has been observed in the e+e−→ pp̅ cross section. A sharp drop in the e+ e−→ 3(π+π−) cross section has been con?rmed and found to have a width of less than 2 MeV, in agreement with the observed fast rise of the e+e−→ pp̅ cross section. For the ?rst time a similar sharp drop is demonstrated in the e+e−→ K+ K−π+π− cross section. The behavior of the e+e−→ 3(π+ π−), K+ K−π+π− cross sections cannot be explained by an interference of any resonance amplitude with continuum, therefore this phenomenon cannot be due to a narrow near-threshold resonance. No such structure has been observed in the e+e−→ 2(π+π−) cross section.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEPJ Web of ConferencesSame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207