MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2949126532 · doi:10.1051/epjconf/201921207002

The NNbar and multihadron production at the threshold at VEPP2000

2019· article· en· W2949126532 on OpenAlexaff
E. P. Solodov, R.R. Akhmetshin, Artem Amirkhanov, A. V. Anisenkov, V.M. Aulchenko, V.Sh. Banzarov, N.S. Bashtovoy, D. E. Berkaev, A. Bondar, A.V. Bragin, S.I. Eidelman, D. Epifanov, L.B. Epshteyn, A.L. Erofeev, G.V. Fedotovich, S.E. Gayazov, A.A. Grebenuk, S.S. Gribanov, D. N. Grigoriev, F.V. Ignatov, V. L. Ivanov, S.V. Karpov, V. F. Kazanin, I. A. Koop, A. N. Kirpotin, A. Korobov, A. Kozyrev, E.A. Kozyrev, P. Krokovny, A.E. Kuzmenko, A. Kuzmin, I.B. Logashenko, P.A. Lukin, K. Mikhailov, V.S. Okhapkin, Yu.N. Pestov, Alexander Popov, G.P. Razuvaev, Yu. A. Rogovsky, A.A. Ruban, N.M. Ryskulov, A.E. Ryzhenenkov, A. Semenov, Yu. M. Shatunov, P. Yu. Shatunov, V. Shebalin, D.N. Shemyakin, B. Shwartz, D. B. Shwartz, A.L. Sibidanov, В.М. Титов, A. A. Talyshev, A.I. Vorobiov, I. M. Zemlyansky, Yu. V. Yudin

Bibliographic record

VenueEPJ Web of Conferences · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsCross section (physics)AmplitudeResonance (particle physics)Nuclear physicsHadronNucleonDrop (telecommunication)Scattering cross-sectionAtomic physicsOpticsTelecommunicationsScatteringQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A study of hadron production at the nucleon-antinucleon threshold has been performed with the CMD-3 detector at the VEPP-2000 e + e − collider. A very fast rise with an about 1 MeV width has been observed in the e + e − → pp ̅ cross section. A sharp drop in the e + e − → 3(π + π − ) cross section has been con?rmed and found to have a width of less than 2 MeV, in agreement with the observed fast rise of the e + e − → pp ̅ cross section. For the ?rst time a similar sharp drop is demonstrated in the e + e − → K + K − π + π − cross section. The behavior of the e + e − → 3(π + π − ), K + K − π + π − cross sections cannot be explained by an interference of any resonance amplitude with continuum, therefore this phenomenon cannot be due to a narrow near-threshold resonance. No such structure has been observed in the e + e − → 2(π + π − ) cross section.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEPJ Web of ConferencesSame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207