MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Algebraic Statistics in Practice: Applications to Networks

2019· preprint· en· W2949141555 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Marta Casanellas, Sonja Petrović, Caroline Uhler

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnual Review of Statistics and Its Application · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de RecercaOffice of Naval ResearchCanadian Institute of Steel ConstructionNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMultilinear mapAlgebra over a fieldMultilinear algebraAlgebraic numberRelevance (law)Computer scienceAlgebraic structureAlgebraic geometryCommutative algebraAbstract algebraMathematicsAlgebra representationDiscrete mathematicsCellular algebraPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Algebraic statistics uses tools from algebra (especially from multilinear algebra, commutative algebra, and computational algebra), geometry, and combinatorics to provide insight into knotty problems in mathematical statistics. In this review, we illustrate this on three problems related to networks: network models for relational data, causal structure discovery, and phylogenetics. For each problem, we give an overview of recent results in algebraic statistics, with emphasis on the statistical achievements made possible by these tools and their practical relevance for applications to other scientific disciplines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.009
Scholarly communication0.0070.010
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnual Review of Statistics and Its ApplicationSame topicBayesian Modeling and Causal InferenceFrench-language works237,207