Entropic Trapping of DNA with a Nanofiltered Nanopore
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Elucidating the kinetics of DNA passage through a solid-state nanopore is a fertile field of research, and mechanisms for controlling capture, passage, and trapping of biopolymers are likely to find numerous technological applications. Here we present a nanofiltered nanopore device, which forms an entropic cage for DNA following first passage through the nanopore, trapping the translocated DNA and permitting recapture for subsequent reanalysis and investigation of kinetics of passage under confinement. We characterize the trapping properties of this nanodevice by driving individual DNA polymers into the nanoscale gap separating the nanofilter and the pore, forming an entropic cage similar to a "two pores in series" device, leaving polymers to diffuse in the cage for various time lengths, and attempting to recapture the same molecule. We show that the cage results in effectively permanent trapping when the radius of gyration of the target polymer is significantly larger than the radii of the pores in the nanofilter. We also compare translocation dynamics as a function of translocation direction in order to study the effects of confinement on DNA just prior to translocation, providing further insight into the nanopore translocation process. This nanofiltered nanopore device realizes simple fabrication of a femtoliter nanoreactor in which to study fundamental biophysics and biomolecular reactions on the single-molecule level. The device provides an electrically-permeable single-molecule trap with a higher entropic barrier to escape than previous attempts to fabricate similar structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".