MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2949249212 · doi:10.1093/imrn/rnz257

Dynamical Uniform Bounds for Fibers and a Gap Conjecture

2019· preprint· en· W2949249212 on OpenAlexaff
Jason P. Bell, Dragos Ghioca, Matthew Satriano

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Mathematics Research Notices · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndomorphismMathematicsProjective varietyCombinatoricsConjectureMorphismAlgebraically closed fieldVariety (cybernetics)Finite fieldField (mathematics)Integer (computer science)Orbit (dynamics)Discrete mathematicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We prove a uniform version of the Dynamical Mordell–Lang Conjecture for étale maps; also, we obtain a gap result for the growth rate of heights of points in an orbit along an arbitrary endomorphism of a quasiprojective variety defined over a number field. More precisely, for our 1st result, we assume $X$ is a quasi-projective variety defined over a field $K$ of characteristic $0$, endowed with the action of an étale endomorphism $\Phi $, and $f\colon X\longrightarrow Y$ is a morphism with $Y$ a quasi-projective variety defined over $K$. Then for any $x\in X(K)$, if for each $y\in Y(K)$, the set $S_{x,y}:=\{n\in{\mathbb{N}}\colon f(\Phi ^n(x))=y\}$ is finite, then there exists a positive integer $N_x$ such that $\sharp S_{x,y}\le N_x$ for each $y\in Y(K)$. For our 2nd result, we let $K$ be a number field, $f:X\dashrightarrow{\mathbb{P}}^1$ is a rational map, and $\Phi $ is an arbitrary endomorphism of $X$. If ${\mathcal{O}}_{\Phi }(x)$ denotes the forward orbit of $x$ under the action of $\Phi $, then either $f({\mathcal{O}}_{\Phi }(x))$ is finite, or $\limsup _{n\to \infty } h(f(\Phi ^n(x)))/\log (n)>0$, where $h(\cdot )$ represents the usual logarithmic Weil height for algebraic points.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Mathematics Research NoticesSame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207