MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2949304880 · doi:10.1021/ic502955h

Many Metals Make the Cut: Quaternary Rare-Earth Germanides RE<sub>4</sub>M<sub>2</sub>InGe<sub>4</sub> (M = Fe, Co, Ni, Ru, Rh, Ir) and RE<sub>4</sub>RhInGe<sub>4</sub> Derived from Excision of Slabs in RE<sub>2</sub>InGe<sub>2</sub>

2015· article· en· W2949304880 on OpenAlexafffund
Anton O. Oliynyk, Stanislav S. Stoyko, Arthur Mar

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRare-earth and actinide compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryRare earthQuaternaryCrystallographyInorganic chemistryMineralogyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The formation of quaternary rare-earth (RE) germanides containing transition metals (M's) from groups 6 to 10 was investigated through arc-melting and annealing reactions at 800 °C; about 50 new compounds were obtained. These include several new series of quaternary germanides RE4M2InGe4 (M = Fe, Co, Ru, Rh, Ir), previously known only for M = Mn and Ni; additional members of RE4Ni2InGe4 extended to other RE substituents; and a different but closely related series RE4RhInGe4. Detailed crystal structures were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies for 20 compounds. Monoclinic structures in space group C2/m are adopted by RE4M2InGe4 (Ho4Ni2InGe4-type, a = 15.1-16.5 Å, b = 4.1-4.4 Å, c = 6.9-7.3 Å, β = 106.2-108.6°) and RE4RhInGe4 (own type, a = 20.0-20.2 Å, b = 4.2-4.3 Å, c = 10.1-10.2 Å, β = 105.0-105.3°). Both structures contain frameworks built from MGe4 tetrahedra, InGe4 square planes, and Ge2 dimers, delimiting tunnels occupied by RE atoms. These structures can also be derived by cutting slabs along different directions from the more symmetrical RE2InGe2 structure. Although the Ge2 dimers are relatively invariant, the InGe4 square planes can undergo distortion to form two sets of short versus long In-Ge distances. This distortion results from a competition between M-Ge bonding in the MGe4 tetrahedra and In-Ge bonding in the InGe4 square planes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicRare-earth and actinide compoundsFrench-language works237,207